Understanding the Austrian School of Economics: Main Ideas and Insights

The Austrian School of Economics, celebrated for its unorthodox and inventive approach, holds a central position in economic theory. 

In reality, the economic world is quite linked to the doctrines of the Austrian School of Economics, so much so that the theories behind this school continue to be, in many cases, the root of knowledge. 

Much like contemplative monks in their monastic retreats, the economists affiliated with the Austrian School of Economics are engaged in intellectual exploration, delving into intricate economic enigmas through the art of “thought experiments”.

You may read: Guide: What Are Green Bonds and How to Buy Them?

At its heart, the Austrian School of Economics, frequently known simply as the Austrian School, places its faith in the potential to unearth economic truths through contemplative thinking alone, distinguishing it as a distinctive and pioneering contributor to economic theory. 

Keep reading as we delve into the evolution and significance of the Austrian School of Economics, examining its profound influence on various economic principles.

The Establishment of the Austrian School of Economics

The Austrian School of Economics, or the Austrian School for short, is renowned for its unconventional approach to economic theory. The Austrian School of Economics has carved a unique niche within the realm of economic thought. 

If you harbor the common assumption that economists are perpetually preoccupied with intricate mathematical models and devoid of creative thinking, you should acquaint yourself with the Austrian School of Economics, you might find yourself a few surprises.

What we recognize today as the Austrian School of Economics was not molded overnight; rather, it has traversed a journey of evolution during which the wisdom of one generation was bequeathed to the next. 

While the school has embraced progress and assimilated external knowledge, its fundamental principles remain unaltered.

Carl Menger, an Austrian economist renowned for his work “Principles of Economics” in 1871, is widely acknowledged as the progenitor of the Austrian School of Economics. 

The title of Menger’s treatise may seem unassuming, but its contents have substantially influenced the marginalism revolution.

In his work, Menger elucidated the subjective nature of economic values attributed to goods and services, underscoring that the worth of an item may differ from one individual to another. 

Menger further contended that as the quantity of goods increases, their subjective value to an individual diminishes. This profound insight forms the basis for the concept of diminishing marginal utility.

Subsequently, another luminary of the Austrian School of Economics, Ludwig von Mises, extended the theory of marginal utility to the domain of money in his seminal work, “Theory of Money and Credit” (1912). 

This application of the theory of diminishing marginal utility to money offers insight into a fundamental economic query: How much money is too much? The answer, as posited by the Austrian School of Economics, hinges on subjectivity. 

An additional dollar in the hands of a billionaire would scarcely make a difference, while the same dollar would be invaluable to a pauper.

Apart from Carl Menger and Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian School of Economics boasts other prominent figures such as Eugen von Bohm-Bawerk, Friedrich Hayek, among others. 

The influence of the Austrian School of Economics extends far beyond Vienna and resonates on a global scale.

Over time, the foundational principles of the Austrian School of Economics have yielded invaluable insights into a plethora of economic matters, including the laws of supply and demand, the origins of inflation, the theory of money creation, and the mechanics of foreign exchange rates. 

On each of these topics, the perspectives of the Austrian School of Economics tend to diverge from those of mainstream economic schools.

Economic Laws of Universal Applicability

The Austrian School of Economics employs a priori reasoning, which hinges on individual contemplation without the need for external data, to uncover economic laws with universal relevance. 

This methodology contrasts sharply with other mainstream economic schools, such as the neoclassical and new Keynesian schools, which rely on empirical data and mathematical models to substantiate their assertions. 

Notably, the Austrian School of Economics can be explicitly juxtaposed with the German historical school, which rejects the notion of universally applicable economic theorems.

Price Determination

According to the Austrian School of Economics, prices are determined by subjective factors like an individual’s preference to purchase or abstain from buying a specific good. 

In contrast, classical economics posits that objective production costs dictate prices, while neoclassical economics contends that prices are shaped by the equilibrium between supply and demand.

The Austrian School of Economics dismisses both the classical and neoclassical viewpoints, asserting that production costs are also subject to subjective influences tied to the alternative uses of scarce resources, and that the equilibrium of supply and demand is similarly shaped by individual preferences.

You may also read: Externalities in Economics and Market Failure

Heterogeneity of Capital Goods

A foundational insight from the Austrian School of Economics is the recognition that capital goods are inherently heterogeneous. In simpler terms, tools like hammers, nails, lumber, machines, and bricks are unique and cannot be seamlessly interchanged. 

While this may seem self-evident, it carries profound implications within broader economic models. The Austrian School of Economics emphasizes that capital is a varied and distinct concept.

This perspective diverges from Keynesian economics, which oversimplifies the notion of capital. In Keynesian models, output is calculated as a function of labor and capital. Consequently, in a Keynesian framework, producing $10,000 worth of nails is considered equivalent to producing a $10,000 tractor. 

The Austrian School of Economics, however, contends that the production of inappropriate capital goods results in real economic inefficiency, necessitating at times painful corrections.

Interest Rates

The Austrian School of Economics challenges the classical view that interest rates are dictated by the interplay of capital supply and demand. Instead, it posits that interest rates are shaped by the subjective choices of individuals concerning immediate or future expenditure. 

Put simply, interest rates are driven by the time preferences of borrowers and lenders. For instance, an uptick in saving rates implies that consumers are deferring present consumption in favor of greater future resources and capital.

The Ramifications of Inflation

The Austrian School of Economics asserts that any increase in the money supply, not substantiated by a corresponding increase in the production of goods and services, results in inflation. 

Nevertheless, this inflation does not manifest uniformly across all goods and services. Some commodities may experience price surges more rapidly than others, leading to an amplified divergence in relative prices. 

For instance, a plumber named Peter may find himself earning the same wage for his services, yet he is compelled to spend more when purchasing bread from a baker named Paul.

This fluctuation in relative prices can render Paul wealthier at Peter’s expense. The Austrian School of Economics seeks to clarify why this transpires. If all goods and services experienced simultaneous price increases, the situation would be inconsequential. 

However, the prices of goods that absorb the initial injection of money into the economic system adapt more swiftly than others. 

For instance, if the government injects money into the market through the purchase of corn, the price of corn would escalate prior to other goods, generating price distortions.

Business Cycles

The Austrian School of Economics ascribes business cycles to distortions in interest rates that result from government efforts to manipulate the money supply. When interest rates are artificially maintained at abnormally low or high levels due to governmental intervention, capital allocation is skewed. This imbalance prompts an economic downturn.

Why do recessions inevitably occur? The resources and labor committed to inappropriate industries, such as construction and renovation during the 2008 financial crisis, necessitate redeployment toward economically viable endeavors. 

This short-term business correction leads to reduced real investment and heightened unemployment.

In an effort to stave off recessions, governments or central banks may endeavor to lower interest rates or prop up ailing sectors. Nevertheless, Austrian theorists contend that such interventions exacerbate misallocation of resources, intensifying the severity of recessions when they eventually materialize.

The Genesis of Markets

The Austrian School of Economics perceives market mechanisms not as outcomes of deliberate design but as emergent processes driven by individuals’ aspirations to enhance their lives. 

Markets evolve as a consequence of human interactions, without the need for conscious planning. If a group of novices were marooned on a deserted island, their interactions would inevitably engender the formation of a market mechanism.

In Summary

The economic theory of the Austrian School of Economics is rooted in verbal logic, offering a respite from the technical jargon that characterizes mainstream economics. Despite substantial disparities with other schools of economic thought, the Austrian School of Economics has etched a lasting niche in the intricate realm of economic theory.

Keep reading: Inflation vs Deflation: This Is How They Affect Your Finances